I. This news makes people assume that 司法院長賴英照 think highly of ethics.
The allegation that 扁案 proceeding was unconstitutional cannot be answered with No comment:
Finally, what's his comment about stonewalling 李慶安's American citizenship investigation for 300 days and 馬英九叛國 cases for 150 days? He has nothing to say.
賴英照：律師兩年後擬加考倫理II. The next news showed that two judges protested to the same 司法院長賴英照 that the proceeding in the case of 扁案 was unconstitutional.
yam天空新聞 -2008年12月29日
〔記者羅正明／竹縣報導〕司法院長賴英照昨天應邀到中央大學法律及政治研究所演講，他鼓勵學生專業之外也要重視倫理。並指考試院已慎重考量兩年後的律師考試，是否加考倫理考題。 有學生當面問及陳水扁洗錢案，但他強調不適合對個案發表意見。 賴英照的講題是「我的學思 ...
司法樁腳說 洪英花：受過國民黨栽培III.
自由時報 -13小時前
〔本報訊〕台北地方法院將扁案併給審判長蔡守訓的合議庭審理引發部分外界輿論，宜蘭地方法院院長黃瑞華與士林地方法院刑庭庭長洪英花12月31日上午聯袂主動求見司法院長賴英照表達不認同，結果引發國民黨立委邱毅、蔡正元昨日在政論節目暗批兩位法官是陳前總統的「司法樁 ...
賴英照：不評論個案
聯合新聞網 -2008年12月30日
台北地方法院就扁案分案引發外界疑慮，有法官投書報章及在內部論壇網站批評，要求司法院調查，以釋群疑；司法院長賴英照昨天重申，司法院不評論個案，且避免採取可能讓外界認為影響獨立公正審判的措施。 扁家弊案先分案給審判長周占春的重金庭，後來又併案給原審判國務機 ...
賴英照：尊重司法給法官純淨審判空間自由時報
地院高層批扁案併給蔡守訓有違審判獨立應回復周占春NOWnews
扁案北院抽籤引質疑司法院：不評論個案臺灣新浪網
The allegation that 扁案 proceeding was unconstitutional cannot be answered with No comment:
黃瑞華與洪英花: the case was handled unconstitionally because of ...To say no comment means he will proceed even if the case is indeed handled unconstitutionally. As Justice Chief, he is responsible to make sure that the case was handled legally. So, why is it that he did not even put out a pretense of respecting law? The ethical facade was destroyed by his unethically stonewalling us with no comments when we need him to assure us that the proceeding was legal.
賴英照: No comment.
Finally, what's his comment about stonewalling 李慶安's American citizenship investigation for 300 days and 馬英九叛國 cases for 150 days? He has nothing to say.
No comments:
Post a Comment